AI, Simulation and the Death of the “Track-Only” Engineer in Formula 1

By Scarlett Warner -
4 min read

There was a time in Formula 1 when the track decided everything. If an engineer could read a car in real time, feel its balance through driver feedback, and out-think rivals between sessions, they were indispensable.

That version of F1 no longer exists.

Cost caps, ATR restrictions, limited testing, and hyper-compressed race weekends have quietly shifted where performance is created. Today, the most important decisions affecting lap time are being made weeks before a car ever rolls out of the garage and increasingly by people who may not travel to every race.

In modern F1, the centre of gravity has moved away from the circuit.

When Track Time Became a Luxury

Between the cost cap and Sporting Regulations, track running is now one of the most constrained resources in the sport. Free practice is shorter, testing is limited, and correlation must be achieved with near-perfect efficiency.

There is no longer room for:

  • Trial-and-error setup work
  • “Let’s see what happens” experiments
  • Learning the car live on Friday

Teams are expected to arrive at FP1 with a narrow operating window already defined by simulation, CFD, and historical data. The circuit is no longer the place to explore possibilities, it’s where assumptions are validated or exposed.

That reality has fundamentally changed the engineer profile that creates value.

Simulation Now Leads the Performance Loop

In F1 today, simulation is not a support function. It leads development.

AI-assisted modelling, digital twins, driver-in-the-loop simulators, and massive offline simulation runs define:

  • Setup direction before a race
  • Aero and mechanical trade-offs
  • Tyre usage and energy management
  • Race strategy probabilities

Engineers who can build, interrogate, and challenge these models are shaping performance long before the race team arrives at the circuit.

By contrast, engineers whose value exists primarily in reacting at the track are finding their influence steadily eroded, not because they lack talent, but because the system no longer rewards that skillset in isolation.

The End of the “Track-Only” Engineer

F1 hasn’t eliminated track engineers. It has eliminated track-only engineers.

The most effective race engineers, performance engineers, and vehicle dynamics specialists today all share a common trait: they are deeply embedded in the virtual development loop.

They understand:

  • How simulation assumptions are built
  • Where models break down
  • Which outputs are robust and which are misleading
  • How to translate virtual results into real-world decisions under parc fermé

Engineers who cannot operate in that space, who treat simulation as a black box, are increasingly limited in their progression.

What This Means for F1 Careers

This shift has quietly changed the career trajectories inside teams.

Engineers who master simulation and data are:

  • Progressing faster
  • Being trusted with broader scope
  • Becoming attractive to rival teams
  • Moving easily into senior performance roles

Meanwhile, others are finding themselves confined to execution roles at the circuit, with diminishing strategic influence.

The uncomfortable truth is that F1 now rewards scalability. An engineer who improves a model can influence every lap, every weekend, every car. An engineer who only reacts at the track influences a shrinking slice of performance.

Where Teams Still Get It Wrong

Despite this reality, many F1 hiring decisions are still anchored in outdated signals:

  • Number of races attended
  • Time spent on the pit wall
  • Previous team “brand”

Some of the most valuable engineers in the paddock rarely feature in highlight photos. They sit in the factory, running simulations at 2am, improving correlation by fractions, quietly creating lap time that never gets credited.

Teams that fail to recognise this are already losing talent—often not to direct rivals, but to organisations that better understand modern performance creation.

A Headhunter’s Perspective

From a recruitment standpoint, the gap between how F1 operates and how F1 hires is still closing but not closed.

The teams winning the talent war are not looking for the best track stories. They are looking for engineers who can connect the virtual and physical worlds without ego.

The track will always matter in Formula 1. But it is no longer where performance begins.

The future belongs to engineers who know the answer before the lights go out and can explain exactly why.

Share

Solutions driven
recruitment

In today’s market, finding the right talent requires more than just posting a job advert. Scarcity of specialised skills and competition for top talent means recruitment has become increasingly complex. Tiro thrives in this space, using tailored recruitment strategies to connect businesses with the hard-to-find individuals who make a real difference.

We offer results without compromise by combining deep industry knowledge with access to “passive” candidates i.e. people not actively looking for a career change. People that are good at what they do, tend to be happy in their roles, and it is these high calibre individuals that could be perfect fit for your company. Partnering with Tiro gives you best-in-industry talent reach and confidence that every hire is the right one. The result? A recruitment process that saves time, reduces risk, and ensures the best people are placed at the heart of your company’s future.

Finding your hiring process is limiting candidate quality? Talk to Tiro today to find a solution to deliver the talent your business needs.
Scroll to Top